And now for the dramatic conclusion to The Great MP3 Bitrate Experiment youve all been waiting for! The actual bitrates of each audio sample are revealed below, along with how many times each was clicked per the goo.gl URL shortener stats between Thursday, June 21st and Tuesday, June 26th. Limburger ~160kbps VBR 10,265 Cheddar 320kbps CBR 7,183 Gouda raw CD 6,159 Brie ~192kbps VBR 5,508 Feta 128kbps CBR 5,567 During that six day period, my overall Amazon CloudFront and S3 bill for these downloaded audio samples was $103.72 for 800 GB of data, across 200k requests. Based on the raw click stats, it looks like a bunch of folks clicked on the first and second files, then lost interest. Probably because of, yknow, Starship. Still, its encouraging to note that the last two files were both clicked about 5.5k times for those that toughed their way out to the very end. Of those listeners, 3,512 went on to contribute results. Not bad at all! I mean, considering I made everyone listen to what some people consider to be one of the best worst "rock" songs of all time. You guys are troopers, taking one in the ear for the team in the name of science. Thats what I admire about you. I belatedly realized after creating this experiment that there was an easy way to cheat. Simply compress all the samples with FLAC, then sort by filesize. 10,836,505 We+Built+This+City+-+Excerpt+(Feta).flac11,054,288 We+Built+This+City+-+Excerpt+(Limburger).flac11,294,757 We+Built+This+City+-+Excerpt+(Brie).flac11,731,999 We+Built+This+City+-+Excerpt+(Cheddar).flac11,816,415 We+Built+This+City+-+Excerpt+(Gouda).flac The higher the bitrate, apparently, the less compressible the audio files are with lossless FLAC compression. Its a small difference in absolute file size, but its enough to sort exactly with quality. At least you can independently verify that I wasnt tricking anyone in this experiment; each sample was indeed different, and the bitrates are what I said they were. But you guys and gals wouldnt do that, because you arent dirty, filthy cheaters, right? Of course not. Lets go over the actual results. Remember each sample was ranked in a simple web form from 1 to 5, where 1 is worst quality, and 5 is highest quality. The summary statistics for the 3,512 data points: Avg Std dev 160kbps VBR (Limburger) 3.49 1.38 320kbps CBR (Cheddar) 3.30 1.34 raw CD audio (Gouda) 3.34 1.26 192kbps VBR (Brie) 3.27 1.29 128kbps CBR (Feta) 2.95 1.40 (If youd like to perform more detailed statistical analysis, download the Excel 2010 spreadsheet with all the data and have at it.) Even without busting out hard-core statistics, I think its clear from the basic summary statistics graph that only one audio sample here was discernably different than the rest – the 128kbps CBR. And by different I mean "audibly worse". Ive maintained for a long, long time that typical 128kbps MP3s are not acceptable quality. Even for the worst song ever. So I guess we can consider this yet another blind listening test proving that point. Give us VBR at an average bitrate higher than 128kbps, or give us death! But what about the claim that people with dog ears can hear the difference between the higher bitrate MP3 samples? Well, first off, its incredibly strange that the first sample – encoded at a mere 160kbps – does better on average than everything else. I think its got to be bias from appearing first in the list of audio samples. Its kind of an outlier here for no good reason, so we have to almost throw it out. More fuel for the argument that people cant hear a difference at bitrates above 128kbps, and even if they do, theyre probably imagining it. If we didnt throw out this result, wed have to conclude that the 160kbps sample was somehow superior to the raw CD audio, which is … clearly insane. Running T-Test and Analysis of Variance (its in the spreadsheet) on the non-insane results, I can confirm that the 128kbps CBR sample is lower quality with an extremely high degree of statistical confidence. Beyond that, as youd expect, nobody can hear the difference between a 320kbps CBR audio file and the CD. And the 192kbps VBR results have a barely statistically significant difference versus the raw CD audio at the 95% confidence level. Im talking absolutely wafer thin here. Anyway, between the anomalous 160kbps result and the blink-and-youll-miss-it statistical difference between the 192kbps result and the raw CD audio, Im comfortable calling this one as I originally saw it. The data from this experiment confirms what I thought all along: for pure listening, the LAME defaults of 192kbps variable bit rate encoding do indeed provide a safe, optimal aural bang for the byte – even dogs wont be able to hear the difference between 192kbps VBR MP3 tracks and the original CD. [advertisement] Stack Overflow Careers matches the best developers (you!) with the best employers. You can search our job listings or create a profile and even let employers find you.
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/06/concluding-the-great-mp3-bitrate-experiment.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
The PHP Singularity
Look at this incredible thing Ian Baker created. Look at it! What youre seeing is not Photoshopped. This is an actual photo of a real world, honest to God double-clawed hammer. Such a thing exists. Isnt that amazing? And also, perhaps, a little disturbing? That wondrous hammer is a delightful real-world acknowledgement of the epic blog entry PHP: A Fractal of Bad Design. I can't even say what's wrong with PHP, because – okay. Imagine you have uh, a toolbox. A set of tools. Looks okay, standard stuff in there. You pull out a screwdriver, and you see it's one of those weird tri-headed things. Okay, well, that's not very useful to you, but you guess it comes in handy sometimes. You pull out the hammer, but to your dismay, it has the claw part on both sides. Still serviceable though, I mean, you can hit nails with the middle of the head holding it sideways. You pull out the pliers, but they don't have those serrated surfaces; it's flat and smooth. That's less useful, but it still turns bolts well enough, so whatever. And on you go. Everything in the box is kind of weird and quirky, but maybe not enough to make it completely worthless. And there's no clear problem with the set as a whole; it still has all the tools. Now imagine you meet millions of carpenters using this toolbox who tell you "well hey what's the problem with these tools? They're all I've ever used and they work fine!" And the carpenters show you the houses they've built, where every room is a pentagon and the roof is upside-down. And you knock on the front door and it just collapses inwards and they all yell at you for breaking their door. That's what's wrong with PHP. Remember the immediate visceral reaction you had to the double-clawed hammer? Thats exactly the reaction most sane programmers have to their first encounter with the web programming language PHP. This has been going on for years. I published my contribution to the genre in 2008 with PHP Sucks, But It Doesnt Matter. Im no language elitist, but language design is hard. Theres a reason that some of the most famous computer scientists in the world are also language designers. And its a crying shame none of them ever had the opportunity to work on PHP. From what Ive seen of it, PHP isnt so much a language as a random collection of arbitrary stuff, a virtual explosion at the keyword and function factory. Bear in mind this is coming from a guy who was weaned on BASIC, a language that gets about as much respect as Rodney Dangerfield. So I am not unfamiliar with the genre. Except now its 2012, and fellow programmers are still writing long screeds bemoaning the awfulness of PHP! Whats depressing is not that PHP is horribly designed. Does anyone even dispute that PHP is the worst designed mainstream "language" to blight our craft in decades? Whats truly depressing is that so little has changed. Just one year ago, legendary hacker Jamie Zawinski had this to say about PHP: I used to think that PHP was the biggest, stinkiest dump that the computer industry had taken on my life in a decade. Then I started needing to do things that could only be accomplished in AppleScript. Is PHP so broken as to be unworkable? No. Clearly not. The great crime of PHP is its utter banality. Its continued propularity is living proof that quality is irrelevant; cheap and popular and everywhere always wins. PHP is the Nickelback of programming languages. And, yes, out of frustration with the status quo I may have recently referred to Rasmus Lerdorf, the father of PHP, as historys greatest monster. Ive told myself a million times to stop exaggerating. The hammer metaphor is apt, because at its core, this is about proper tooling. As presciently noted by Alex Papadimoulis: A client has asked me to build and install a custom shelving system. Im at the point where I need to nail it, but Im not sure what to use to pound the nails in. Should I use an old shoe or a glass bottle? How would you answer the question? It depends. If you are looking to pound a small (20lb) nail in something like drywall, youll find it much easier to use the bottle, especially if the shoe is dirty. However, if you are trying to drive a heavy nail into some wood, go with the shoe: the bottle will shatter in your hand. There is something fundamentally wrong with the way you are building; you need to use real tools. Yes, it may involve a trip to the toolbox (or even to the hardware store), but doing it the right way is going to save a lot of time, money, and aggravation through the lifecycle of your product. You need to stop building things for money until you understand the basics of construction. What we ought to be talking about is not how terrible PHP is – although its continued terribleness is a particularly damning indictment – but how we programmers can culturally displace a deeply flawed tool with a better one. How do we encourage new programmers to avoid picking up the double clawed hammer in favor of, well, a regular hammer? This is not an abstract, academic concern to me. Im starting a new open source web project with the goal of making the code as freely and easily runnable to the world as possible. Despite the serious problems with PHP, I was forced to consider it. If you want to produce free-as-in-whatever code that runs on virtually every server in the world with zero friction or configuration hassles, PHP is damn near your only option. If that doesnt scare you, then check your pulse, because you might be dead. Therefore, Id like to submit a humble suggestion to my fellow programmers. The next time you feel the urge to write Yet Another Epic Critique of PHP, consider that: We get it already. PHP is horrible, but its used everywhere. Guess what? It was just as horrible in 2008. And 2005. And 2002. Theres a pattern here, but its subtle. You have to look very closely to see it. On second thought, never mind. Youre probably not smart enough to figure it out. The best way to combat something as pervasively and institutionally awful as PHP is not to point out all its (many, many, many) faults, but to build compelling alternatives and make sure these alternatives are equally pervasive, as easy to set up and use as possible. Weve got a long way to go. One of the explicit goals of my next project is to do whatever we can to buff up a … particular … open source language ecosystem such that it can truly compete with PHP in ease of installation and deployment. From my perspective, the point of all these "PHP is broken" rants is not just to complain, but to help educate and potentially warn off new coders starting new codebases. Some fine, even historic work has been done in PHP despite the madness, unquestionably. But now we need to work together to fix what is broken. The best way to fix the PHP problem at this point is to make the alternatives so outstanding that the choice of the better hammer becomes obvious. Thats the PHP Singularity Im hoping for. Im trying like hell to do my part to make it happen. How about you? [advertisement] How are you showing off your awesome? Create a Stack Overflow Careers profile and show off all of your hard work from Stack Overflow, Github, and virtually every other coding site. Who knows, you might even get recruited for a great new position!
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/06/the-php-singularity.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/06/the-php-singularity.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
Betting the Company on Windows 8
Id argue that the last truly revolutionary version of Windows was Windows 95. In the subsequent 17 years, weve seen a stream of mostly minor and often inconsequential design changes in Windows – at its core, youve got the same old stuff: a start menu, a desktop with icons, taskbar at the bottom, overlapping windows, toolbars, and pull-down menus. Windows 7 may be bigger, prettier, and more refined – finally, a proper sequel to Windows XP – but its also safe. Rote. Familiar. Maybe a little too safe. Windows 95 was a big deal because it innovated, because it was a break from the status quo. It sold 40 million copies in a year. It marked the coming of age of the Wintel beige box PC hegemony, and in the process dealt a near death blow to Apple and its rapidly aging System 7 OS. But we all know how that story ends – with the iPhone in 2007, and most of all the iPad in 2010, Apple popularized the idea of simple touch computing surfaces that are now defining the Post-PC Era. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. And to their credit, Apple did; that is why their star is ascendant. Kind of absurdly scarily ascendant, actually. Its not like Microsoft isnt investing in R&D. The Surface table looked amazing. Unfortunately, it was also trapped in a ridiculous, giant coffee table form factor that no regular person could afford or even want. Thats too bad, because the Surface table was actually … kind of amazing. Ive only ever seen one, in the lobby of a Seattle hotel in 2008. I went in skeptical, but when I actually got to try the Surface table, I came away impressed. It was a fascinating and intuitive multi-touch experience … that virtually nobody will ever get to experience or use. The iPad also offers a fascinating and intuitive multi-touch experience; lets compare: a multi-touch Surface Table priced at $10,000 that, statistically speaking, nobody will ever be able to see or afford … versus … a multi-touch iPad in the hands of every consumer with $500 in their pocket Now guess which of these companies is currently worth umpteen bazillion dollars. Go on, guess! No, its not Webvan, you jokers. After using the retina iPad for a while, I was shocked just how much of my everyday computing I can pull off on a tablet. Once you strip away all the needless complexities, isnt a tablet the simplest form of a computer there can be? How could it get any simpler than a tablet? Is this the ultimate and final form of computing? I wonder. Its a display in your hands, with easy full-screen applications that have simple oversize click targets to poke your finger at, and no confusing file systems to puzzle over or power-draining x86 backwards compatibility to worry about. Heck, maybe a tablet is better than traditional PCs, because it sidesteps all the accumulated cruft and hacks the PC ecosystem has accreted over the last 30 years. If youre Microsoft, this is the point at which you should be crapping your pants in abject fear. It is nothing less than the first stages of the heat death of the PC ecosystem, the formation of a tidal wave that will flow inexorably forward from this point. But you cant say they didnt see it coming. Bill Gates, of all people, saw this coming all the way back in 1995, the same year Windows 95 was released. One scary possibility being discussed by Internet fans is whether they should get together and create something far less expensive than a PC which is powerful enough for Web browsing. This new platform would optimize for the datatypes on the Web. Gordon Bell and others approached Intel on this and decided Intel didnt care about a low cost device so they started suggesting that General Magic or another operating system with a non-Intel chip is the best solution. To be honest, I had almost written Microsoft off at this point, to the "whatever the abomination that IBM is now" enterprisey deadpool. Its not like they would disappear, necessarily, but they no longer had a viable horse in the race for the future of consumer computing devices. In these darkest of hours, I was actually considering … switching to OS X. That is, until I tried Windows 8, and until I watched Microsoft unveil Surface. No, not the huge table one, the new one thats roughly the size (and one hopes, the price) of the iPad. I was expecting Yet Another Incremental Improvement to Windows, but I got something else altogether. It took a little longer than originally anticipated, but whats 17 years between friends? Windows 8 is, in my humble opinion, the most innovative version of Windows Microsoft has released since Windows 95. Maybe ever. And its good. Really good! I cant remember the last time I was this excited about a Windows release, except when I was kind of obsessively running betas of Windows 95 and waiting for Windows 95 to be released. Dont judge me man! Whats good about Windows 8? A ton of stuff. Excellent, beautiful, "live tile" Metro multi-touch tablet optimized interface, as honed from two prior Windows Phone releases. Integrated app store with updates for Metro apps. Yes, it actually works. Fantastic new overlay notification system. Noticeably faster to boot, faster to shut down, faster to sleep. Its just faster. Awesome new Task Manager. I am seriously in love with this thing. Updated Office 2010 style "ribbon" Explorer UI. New copy dialog with graph of transfer rates over time, along with a visible moving average. Lower system requirements and smaller footprint than Windows 7. Thats just a list off the top of my head. But dont take my word for it. Download the free Release Preview and try Windows 8 yourself. Now, I will warn you that Windows 8 definitely has a wee bit of Jekyll and Hyde going on, because it smushes together two radically different paradigms: the old school mouse and keyboard centric desktop UI, and the new school tablet and touch centric Metro UI. It can be disconcerting to get kicked abruptly from one to the other. Its different, so theres a learning curve. (Protip: using your mouse scroll wheel in a Metro panel scrolls sideways. Dont forget the hover corners, or the right click, either.) But I have to say, this choice seems, at least so far, to be a bit saner approach than the super hard totally incompatible iOS/OSX divide in Apple land. I expect that most people will decide early on whether they prefer treating their computer like a traditional laptop, or a tablet, and stick to their guns. Fortunately, the tablet stuff in Windows 8 doesnt get in the way. Even if only used as a glorified Start Menu, the Metro interface works surprisingly well – just start typing and match what you want to launch. Whats even more amazing is that Microsoft is actually pricing the upgrade sanely. Can you believe its only $40 to upgrade from Windows 8 from XP, Vista, or Windows 7? Its like someone at Microsoft woke up and finally listened to what Ive desperately been trying to tell them for years. In the post PC era, Microsoft is betting the company on Windows 8, desperately trying to serve two masters with one operating system. The traditional mouse and keyboard desktop is no longer the default; it is still there, but slightly hidden from view, as the realm of computer nuts, power users, and geeks. For everyone else, the Metro UI puts an all new, highly visual touch and tablet friendly face on the old beige Wintel box. Will Microsoft succeed? Im not sure yet. But based on what Ive seen so far of Windows 8, its pricing, and the new Surface hardware – Im cautiously optimistic. [advertisement] Hiring developers? Post your open positions with Stack Overflow Careers and reach over 20MM awesome devs already on Stack Overflow. Create your satisfaction-guaranteed job listing today!
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/07/betting-the-company-on-windows-8.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/07/betting-the-company-on-windows-8.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
Coding Horror: The Book
If I had to make a list of the top 10 things Ive done in my life that I regret, "writing a book" would definitely be on it. I took on the book project mostly because it was an opportunity to work with a few friends whose company I enjoy. I had no illusions going in about the rapidly diminishing value of technical books in an era of pervasive high speed Internet access, and the book writing process only reinforced those feelings. In short, do not write a book. Youll put in mountains of effort for precious little reward, tangible or intangible. In the end, all you will have to show for it is an out-of-print dead tree tombstone. The only people who will be impressed by that are the clueless and the irrelevant. As I see it, for the kind of technical content were talking about, the online world of bits completely trumps the offline world of atoms: Its forever searchable. You, not your publisher, will own it. Its instantly available to anyone, anywhere in the world. It can be cut and pasted; it can be downloaded; it can even be interactive. It can potentially generate ad revenue for you in perpetuity. And heres the best part: you can always opt to create a print version of your online content, and instantly get the best of both worlds. But it only makes sense in that order. Writing a book may seem like a worthy goal, but your time will be better spent channeling the massive effort of a book into creating content online. Every weakness I listed above completely melts away if you redirect your effort away from dead trees and spend it on growing a living, breathing website presence online. A few weeks ago, Hyperink approached me with a concept of packaging the more popular entries on Coding Horror, its "greatest hits" if you will, into an eBook. They seemed to have a good track record doing this with other established bloggers, and I figured it was time to finally practice what Ive been preaching all these years. So you can now download Effective Programming: More Than Writing Code for an introductory price of $2.99. Its available in Kindle, iPad, Nook, and PDF formats. Ive written about the ongoing tension between bits and atoms recently, and I want to be clear: I am a fan of books. Im just not necessarily a fan of writing them. I remain deeply cynical about current book publishing models, which feel fundamentally broken to me. No matter the price of the book, outside of J.K. Rowling, youre basically buying the author a drink. As the author, you can expect to make about a dollar on every copy that sells. The publisher makes several times that, so they make a nice profit with as few as, say, five thousand copies sold. Books that sell ten or fifteen thousand are rare, and considered strong sellers. So lets say you strike gold. After working on your book for a year or more, are you going to be happy with a payday of ten to fifteen grand? Incidentally, dont expect your royalty check right away. The publisher gets paid first, by the bookstores, and the publisher may then hold on to your money for several months before they part with any of it. Yes, this is legal: its in the publishers contract. Not getting paid may be a bummer for you, but its a great deal for the publisher, since they make interest on the float (all the money they owe to their authors) - which is another profit stream. Theyll claim one reason for the delay is the sheer administrative challenge of cutting a check within three months (so many authors to keep track of! so many payments!)... a less ridiculous reason is that they have to wait to see whether bookstores are going to return unsold copies of your book for a full refund. Heres one real world example. John Resig sold 4,128 copies of Pro Javascript, for which he earned a grand total of $1.87 per book once you factor in his advance. This is a book which still sells for $29.54 on Amazon new. Tellingly, Johns second book seems permanently unfinished. Its been listed as "in progress" since 2008. Cant say I blame him. (Update: John explains.) When I buy books, I want most of that money to go to the author, not the publishing middlemen. Id like to see a world where books are distributed electronically for very little cost, and almost all the profits go directly to the author. Im not optimistic this will happen any time soon. I admire people willing to write books, but I honestly think you have to be a little bit crazy to sit down and pound out an entire book these days. I believe smaller units of work are more realistic for most folks. I had an epic email discussion with Scott Meyers about the merits of technical book publishing versus blogging in 2008, and I dont think either of us budged from our initial positions. But he did launch a blog to document some of his thoughts on the matter, which ended with this post: My longer-term goal was to engage in a dialogue with people interested in the production of fast software systems such that I could do a better job with the content of [my upcoming book]. Doing that, however, requires that I write up reasonable initial blog posts to spur discussion, and Ive found that this is not something I enjoy. To be honest, I view it as overhead. Given a choice between doing background research to learn more about a topic (typically reading something, but possibly also viewing a technical presentation, listening to a technical podcast, or exchanging email with a technical expert) or writing up a blog entry to open discussion, I find myself almost invariably doing the research. One reason for this is that I feel obliged to have done some research before I post, anyway, and I typically find that once Im done with the research, writing something up as a standalone blog entry is an enterprise that consumes more time than Im willing to give it. Its typically easier to write the result up in the form of a technical presentation, then give the presentation and get feedback that way. Overhead? I find this attitude perplexing; the research step is indeed critical, but no less important than writing up your results as a coherent blog entry. If you cant explain the results of your research to others, in writing, in a way they can understand, you dont understand it. And if you arent willing to publish your research in the form of a simple web page that anyone in the world can visit and potentially learn from, why did you bother doing that research in the first place? Are you really maximizing the value of your keystrokes? More selfishly, you should always finish by writing up your results purely for your own self-improvement, if nothing else. As Steve Yegge once said: "I have many of my best ideas and insights while blogging." Then you can take all that published writing, fold in feedback and comments from the community, add some editorial embellishment on top, and voilà – you have a great book. Of course, theres no getting around the fact that writing is just plain hard. Seth Godins advice for authors still stands: Lower your expectations. The happiest authors are the ones that dont expect much. Which, I think, is also good life advice in general. Maybe the easiest way to lower your expectations as an author is by attempting to write one or two blog entries a week, keep going as long as you can, and see where that takes you. [advertisement] Whats your next career move? Stack Overflow Careers has the best job listings from great companies, whether youre looking for opportunities at a startup or Fortune 500. You can search our job listings or create a profile and let employers find you.
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/07/coding-horror-the-book.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/07/coding-horror-the-book.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
How To Update Samsung Galaxy S To Value Pack ROM With Face Unlock
In the beginning Samsung had announced that there would be no Android Ice Cream Sandwich for Galaxy S , then recanted, saying that he would receive a value pack of Android 4.0 and, finally, turned off the hopes of users saying that the hardware of the Galaxy S can not support the upgrade . Waiting to tell if indeed the [...]
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Hack-genius/~3/AfQQNCUi4UA/how-to-update-samsung-galaxy-s-to-value-pack-rom-unofficial-with-face-unlock.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Hack-genius/~3/AfQQNCUi4UA/how-to-update-samsung-galaxy-s-to-value-pack-rom-unofficial-with-face-unlock.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
Cut The Rope PC Version Released Now Start Playing It On Your PC
During the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) last night, Microsoft announced a partnership with ZeptoLab to offer a free web version of the famous game, a pastime that many people fall in love: Cut The Rope . The game is made ??entirely in HTML5 and is optimized to work with Internet Explorer 9 on Windows 7though, I tried Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox to play and [...]
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Hack-genius/~3/QLVCRpCDxrE/cut-the-rope-pc-version-released-now-start-playing-it-on-your-pc.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Hack-genius/~3/QLVCRpCDxrE/cut-the-rope-pc-version-released-now-start-playing-it-on-your-pc.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
How To Restore HTC Flyer Tablet To Install The Official Update
If in the past months you have had the curiosity to test the fantastic rom created by mwakious or other, maybe now you'll want to "go back", ie back to factory to install the official update released by HTC Honeycomb. On our forum Fab985 comes to the rescue of us all with the guide: Downgrade from [...]
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Hack-genius/~3/d82n4U0vTXc/how-to-restore-htc-flyer-tablet-to-install-the-official-update.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Hack-genius/~3/d82n4U0vTXc/how-to-restore-htc-flyer-tablet-to-install-the-official-update.html
By Rss to Blog (Computer Tech)
Click Here
http://sbwasim.co.cc/
Contact Me :wasimakhtar@sbwasim.co.cc
<----if you want to earn by Home just call Toll free No.02653090621 and give my userid DS630156 just try it its totaly free----->
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)